‘Kevel-gyan’,
Static or Dynamic?
By
Mr. Sudhir M. Shah
In Jain
Philosophy, the concept of ‘Kevel-gyan’ (a state of omniscience) is an
important one. It is the precursor to ‘Moksha’ (freeing of the soul from the
cycle of birth and death). When a person eliminates all its ‘Ghati’
(destructive) karma, and all but one ‘Aghati’ (non-destructive) karma, the
‘Ayushya’(age determining) karma, his/her soul is purified. This brings
about the true qualities of the soul, namely, infinite knowledge, infinite
perception, infinite energy and bliss. This all knowing and perceiving state is
called Kevel-gyan (omniscience) When ‘Ayushya karma, is eliminated (spent),
the body dies and the soul reaches ‘Moksha’ (salvation). The ultimate
goal of a Jain is to reach this stage.
During my study of Jain philosophy, I have come across literature by several
Jain scholars and thinkers, who have addressed many different concepts related
to Jain conduct. Some of them seem to be giving conflicting views. The
concept of ‘A-karta-vad’, appears to assume the static model of ‘Kevel-gyan’.
Explaining that all our thoughts, actions as well as their consequences are not
in our control, they are pre-determined, based on our ‘Karma’ in previous
lives. To think that one can change anything is only an illusion. ‘A-karta-vad’ suggests that every thing we do, good or bad, is direct result
of fruition of our past ‘Karma’ (Karma no uday). In other words, our past
karma makes us do things. We are only the ‘agents’ of our karma and not the
real doer! The believers of ‘A-karta-vad’ explain by using
‘Kevel-gyan’ as an example. They argue that ‘Kevel-gyan’ gives the
bearer, a complete knowledge of every one’s past, present and future. Thus, if
the future is all known, they conclude, it has to be constant and cannot be
changed by anyone! Arguing that if you believe in ‘Kevel-gyan’, you must
believe in ‘A-karta-vad’. If you assume this static model of ‘Kevel-gyan’,
it absolves you of any action or inaction. A murderer cannot be held responsible
for his action, since all actions and outcomes are predetermined. ‘Purusharth’ (efforts) would have no meaning. There would be no point in
‘doing’ any thing anyway. The world would be a dreadful place. There
would be no difference between humans and animals.
Here is a question for believers of ‘A-karta-vad’. If an individual
has no control over his/her actions, where did their karma come from in the
first place? If they are not the real doers, who is responsible for their karma?
And how does one eliminate these karmas. Under this scenario, no one can
possibly attain ‘Kevel-gyan’. In my opinion, the concept of
‘A-karta-vad’ is the biggest excuse for our inaction.
Now, let us examine the dynamic model of ‘kevel-gyan’. Under this
model, knowing and perceiving is continuous and not fixed. Hence, the future
does not have to be fixed and it is subject to change based on accumulating or
shedding of karma by each individual through thought, speech and action. Here,
although every individual is subject to his/her past karma, he/she can modify
its outcome, as well as influence the future outcomes, based on their new karma.
This does not allow anyone to shirk their responsibility, since each soul is
fully responsible for its past, present and future. No matter how bad a past
karma you may be born with, you always have a hope of influencing your present
and future based on your new karma. Thus, this dynamic model has the ability to
empower every soul, unlike the static model that discourages us from taking any
initiative.
If we assume this dynamic model of ‘Kevel-gyan’, then the concept of
‘A-karta-vad’ dwindles away immediately. Now let us examine this, from
a different angle. Under the static model of ‘Kevel-gyan’, the
knowledge would be absolute and predetermined. However, Jainism as taught to us
by Mahavirswami, gave us this unique concept of anekantvad (non-absolute
logic) stating that all knowledge claims are only tentative and not absolute!
Also if everyone’s future is predetermined and beyond their control, why would
Mahavirswami give us sermons after his ‘Kevel-gyan’ or establish a religious
order?
--------------------------------------------------
Mail
to : Ahimsa Foundation
www.jainsamaj.org
R1661